Forrest Blue Yamaha Drum Forest Blue Yamaha Drum
Pearl Masters Vs. Yamaha Maple
Hey,
Im gonna go ahead and say Yamahas are the best drums out there, hands down. As far as masers vs. Maple custon nouvou (sp)...
Shells
When you compare the 6-ply version pearls to absolutes (since absolutes are all 6 play w 7play bass drum) the pearls tend to be slightly dampened in comparison. this is because pearls plys are thicker than most other drum companies. a thinner shell will resonate more. Because yamaha has such and advanced compression sytem for making their shells, they are able to keep them thin and resonant, without needing reinforcement rings which complicate tone and tuning in the high end ( a la DW).
Plus they are w hole lot lighter!
Hardware
Nouvou (sp) system = best lug system ever! Lowest mass system there is. Some people complain that they drill into the shell, but they drill into the drums nodal point (the point of least resonance in the drum) so it has ver little effect. Also, since the "lugs" and "recievers" are solid machined pieces, there is no air to trap sound, assisting in the tone. Also, yamahas hoops are aluminum diecast, giving the strength and focus of diecast and the resonance and light weight of aluminum
Mounting system
Again, Yamaha takes the cake here. Although the mount is drilled into the shell, like the lugs, it is drilled into the drums nodal point. Pearl masters system has the mount around the tension rods! so when u play, it is constantly pulling on the rods resuling in detuning and extra strain on flimsier lug hardware.
Just my opintion mixed in with a little fact. Happy drumming!
Gear Maniac
I've owned 2 sets of the Yamaha Maple Absolute's over time, and now own a DW Collectors.
The Yamaha are about the best you can get in that $ range. The shells ring like nothing else, the heads stay in tune, and miked up live i think the're the best I've owned.
...I'd buy another no problem.
Gear Addict
Maple Custom Absolutes
I may be the only one in this thread who has a problem with my Yamaha Maple customs. I love the toms, but the kick has always been hard to work with. The kick doesn't have a lot of projection or tone with both batter and reso heads on. I've been playing it without a reso head and it sounds much better, but getting just the batter muffled properly isn't working.
I've tried deader heads, like Evans EQ3 (sounded terrible), blankets, Evans bass drum pillow, all kinds of tuning... all with mild degrees of success, but nothing that made me go WOW. At best, the kick is average to OK sounding. The one thing I still want to try is felt strips.
Also, the hoop is too thick to connect a pedal and have the kick lay flat on the floor. It has to be titled at a sharp angle to meet the beater at its parallel impact point (where the beater shaft is parallel to the head). I've got this part worked out, but not the tone.
Always been a little disappointed by the MC kick. I kept it thinking I could get it sounding on par with the rest of the kit.
I know this is a old tread but I want to put my humble two cents!!!!
I am a recording engineer so this is my point of view from the mixer!!!
Maple and specially birch pearl drums sound a lot better in a recording situation than yamaha maple shell!!! yamaha maple shell is loud but full of ugly harmonics
I got both kits in my studio!!! Personally I use a lot more my pearl masters studio cose I no need add EQ to clean toms I use yamaha recording in pop style musics but for me the one is the pearl masters studio birch!
The yamaha recording model sounds more like a any birch Pearl drum kit I think both are grate options!!!!!
I'm a busy performing and studio drummer and my Maple Customs I have owned for the past 12 years are by far the best sounding drums I've played. They are easily the cleanest sounding drums out there. (the maple customs are totally different and better than the absolutes, which are just ok in my opinion).
They do have some minor issues, including sometimes having too much sustain (yes, that can be a bad thing sometimes) and I also agree that the kick drum can take some work to get sounding good. I am finally adding some recording custom pieces for studio situations where I need a tighter sound, but the MCs are still the primary go to drums for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KickSnareHat ➡️
I'm a busy performing and studio drummer and my Maple Customs I have owned for the past 12 years are by far the best sounding drums I've played. They are easily the cleanest sounding drums out there. (the maple customs are totally different and better than the absolutes, which are just ok in my opinion).
They do have some minor issues, including sometimes having too much sustain (yes, that can be a bad thing sometimes) and I also agree that the kick drum can take some work to get sounding good.
I can't compare my MC's to Absolutes, having never spent any real time with Absolutes. That said, I don't feel that I have to get to know them. The MC's are pretty great drums. The only thing I want to do is put RIMS on the toms, since I feel that the YESS mounts take away from the overall tone.
One question, though.
You mentioned the MC kick takes some tweaking to sound good. What do you do to get the most from the kick? Mine has never quite lived up to the rest of the kit.
Gear Addict
I'm going to be the odd man out and suggest Pearl Masters Birch. It's all about taste though, and Yamaha Maple is too "Smooth Jazz" sounding for my personal preference. Yamaha Birch is another matter, but I've found Yamaha drums and hardware to be cumbersome. If budget isn't an issue, I'd look at Craviotto, Noble & Cooley, or vintage options.
Happy drumming.
Steve
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jax ➡️
I can't compare my MC's to Absolutes, having never spent any real time with Absolutes. That said, I don't feel that I have to get to know them. The MC's are pretty great drums. The only thing I want to do is put RIMS on the toms, since I feel that the YESS mounts take away from the overall tone.
One question, though.
You mentioned the MC kick takes some tweaking to sound good. What do you do to get the most from the kick? Mine has never quite lived up to the rest of the kit.
Regarding the kick, I've found that it needs to be well dampened. I use Power stroke 3s for the heads and a pillow inside to deaden everything. Then I tune the heads a little above flappy. Playing it wide open or even with minimal muffling doesn't seem to work for it -- I've tried just about everything over the years. I had this almost exact same conversation with another drummer recently who came to the same conclusion about their MC kick. It may not seem like a huge sounding kick in a room with this approach, but it sounds really nice when close miked (studio and live).
Best Of Both Worlds
Last edited by guitar4982; 5th February 2012 at 06:01 AM.. Reason: Clarify
Quote:
Originally Posted by wuffb ➡️
The Yammies are more focused, the thicker shells and die-cast alloy rims make for drums that are both warm and precise in pitch and tone for the studio.
Stock Maple Customs have triple flanged hoops. Mine does.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jax ➡️
Stock Maple Customs have triple flanged hoops. Mine does.
I thought so too. . . Till I pulled out the original print material that came with the kit. Yamaha mc's were made with die cast alloy rims . . . Better than triple flange. The drum shells are thicker ply and very heavy as you know . . . Yamaha matched this shell with the alloy rims. Track down the original catalogue and you will find this info there.
Yamaha maple custom rims
I'm thinking Yamaha printed the wrong information in their catalog. Die cast and triple flanged look completely different, and the MC hoops look exactly like triple flanged. If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck... it's triple flanged.
Gear Addict
Last edited by wuffb; 16th February 2012 at 10:19 PM.. Reason: Update
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jax ➡️
I'm thinking Yamaha printed the wrong information in their catalog. Die cast and triple flanged look completely different, and the MC hoops look exactly like triple flanged. If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck... it's triple flanged.
JAX . . . I have the ANSWER!! Contacted Greg Crane at Yamaha (Drum Tech) . . . We are BOTH right . . .
Those hoops were called Power Hoops. Power Hoops were a cross between triple flange and die cast and were made from Aluminum….very cool hoops indeed!
Drummerworld Discussion Quotes:
Yamaha Powerhoop:
"There used to be a 3.0 Power hoop (that looked like a Tripple but had the tickness of a Diecast) it was used on the Maple Custom and some signature snare line. To bad they discontinued it."
"If there ever was a PERFECT compromise between a die cast and triple flange, that was it."
Quote:
Originally Posted by wuffb ➡️
Drummerworld Discussion Quotes:
Yamaha Powerhoop:
"There used to be a 3.0 Power hoop (that looked like a Tripple but had the tickness of a Diecast) it was used on the Maple Custom and some signature snare line. To bad they discontinued it."
"If there ever was a PERFECT compromise between a die cast and triple flange, that was it."
Cool! I did not know that. They sound great whatever the hoops are, and since they're sort of like heavy die cast hoops but with flanges, I'm going to eventually try some normal triple flanged hoops and see what it does to the sound. Thanks for the info!
I've also been wondering how they'd sound with 1.6mm triple flanged hoops, which are lighter than the 'standard' 2.3mm.
In answer to the question about whether or not die cast is better than triple flanged (or in this case, power hoops), it all comes down to personal preference. It depends what the drummer wants from the drum. But no, neither is better than the other.
From what I've experienced, die cast hoops are generally thought to 'dry up' the overtones from a head and drum, and make it easier to tune (because the overtones are less prominent). They also shorten sustain. Triple flanged are almost the opposite, allowing more overtones and harmonic content and longer decay.
JAX: Another reason to NEVER sell these drums . . . they are AMAZING. You mentioned trouble with the kick drum . . . try using an EMAD batter head, with an Evans Resonator Head with a Kick Port and a DW pillow inside.
The sound I have from this kick drum now is nothing short of amazing. It is focused, with depth and serious "punch".
Happy Drumming!!
Never Selling My Maple Customs . . .
I'm new to the forum but I thought I would put my 2 cents in. I previously owned a Pearl Retrospect kit: great sounding bass drum, a bit bright sounding, but sounded great none the less. I could never get the toms to where I wanted them however. This could have been caused by the bearing edges on the kit, which were 45 degrees without a counter cut to the outside to the shell. The bearing edges were cut very cleanly and were incredibly sharp. The head only made contact at the top of the bearing edge, which was very thin, less than an eighth of an inch. My guess is that with this type of bearing edge, very little of the shell is part of the sound, so the sound is more "head" oriented. I contemplated machining the bearing edges to a double 45 similar Yamaha and DW's but decided to replace the kit since the drums are very heavy so they are not gig friendly.
I currently own a Yamaha birch kit, which I purchased second hand. The original owner custom ordered the kit with the recording custom shell and hardware, but with the aluminum die cast hoops and without the black finish on the interior of the shells. Sizes are 10x8, 12x9, 14x12, 16x14, 22x16. WOW is all I can say. Warm and punchy with just the right amount of sustain. The best kit I've ever played and heard. The kit is about 14 years old and I've owned it for about 4 years and it sounds better as it ages if that's possible. I've tried different heads on the toms from clear/coated Emperors, G2's and also clear Pinstripes and EC2's and they all sound fabulous. It just depends on what your preferences are. I currently have coated Vintage Ambassadors on the tops and the clear Ambassadors on the bottom, which is probably my favorite combination: warm, punchy, resonant, and responsive with great articulation.
I've never been a fan of dampening the interior of the bass drum. My preference is the Aquarian Superkick I on batter side tuned just to the point that a tone is created. The resonant head is simply an ported ebony Ambassador, which I dampen with a piece of 2 – 3 inch felt across the back side of it. This is an old school way of dampening the head and it works really well. I like to tune the resonant head low to get a deeper resonating sound. Under microphones, this kit really shines. I would never contemplate replacing it. Only other kit I would consider is a Gretsch USA with the Jasper shells.
Anyway, I just wanted to voice my opinion. All high end drums sound great; the largest influences on the sound are bearing edges, tuning, head selection and shell material. All these factors add up to what you hear. The lesson I learned with the Pearls was to always check the bearing edges first and secondly the thickness of the shells. These factors will give you an indication as the general sound characteristics of the shell. The Yamahas I currently own seem to have the perfect combination of the two.
PHX
Gear Maniac
Source: https://gearspace.com/board/drums-/343934-pearl-masters-vs-yamaha-maple.html
0 Response to "Forrest Blue Yamaha Drum Forest Blue Yamaha Drum"
إرسال تعليق